In a recent court decision, the Long-Term Disability Insurer put great weight in the suggestion that letters by the disabled woman's doctor were "contradictory". The Insurer argued that the doctor's first letter diagnosed Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as the cause of the Claimant's ailments, but in her second letter the doctor suggested her chronic fatigue was caused by sinusitis.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) currently provides a person who has been improperly denied long-term disability benefits, remedies that include reinstatement to the LTD plan, payment of past due benefits, interest, and attorney fees. ERISA remedies do not currently allow the disabled person to recover the additional damages suffered as a consequence of the benefit denial. Such damages may include damage to credit rating, loss of a home, tax liability, loan interest, and other harms that result directly from the improper denial of disability benefits. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has recently joined, "the rising judicial chorus urging that Congress and [this] Court revisit what is an unjust and increasingly tangled ERISA regime." Because the Court has had a cramped construction of the "equitable relief" allowable under ERISA, a "regulatory vacuum" exists. A series of the Court's decisions has yielded a host of situations in which persons adversely affected by ERISA-proscribed wrongdoing cannot gain make-whole relief. There is a stark absence, in ERISA itself and in its legislative history, of any reference to an intention to authorize the recovery of extracontractual damages for consequential injuries. Most recently, the Court ruled that, as " ERISA, by its terms, only allows for equitable relief," the provision excludes "the imposition of personal liability ... for a contractual obligation to pay money."
How to Prove your Disability to the Insurance Company